GPT-4o vs GPT-4: Differences, Pricing & 2026 Status

GPT-4o is OpenAI’s faster, cheaper, natively multimodal model released May 13, 2024, while GPT-4 is the March 14, 2023 text-focused model it replaced. Both are now retired from the ChatGPT consumer app — GPT-4 left on April 30, 2025, and GPT-4o followed on February 13, 2026 — yet both remain reachable through the OpenAI API today. GPT-4o processes text, images, and audio in a single neural network at roughly $2.50 per 1M input tokens and $10 per 1M output tokens, against GPT-4’s text-only design at $30 per 1M input tokens and $60 per 1M output tokens.
This guide compares their features, benchmarks, pricing, and real-world reception, including the unusually emotional backlash that followed GPT-4o’s ChatGPT retirement. For a broader view of OpenAI’s current lineup, see OpenAI Models Guide.
Quick Comparison Table
GPT-4o beats GPT-4 on speed, cost, and multimodal range, while GPT-4’s only structural advantage today is a longer track record in production systems. The table below lines up the specifications that matter most for a migration or model-selection decision. For a related comparison, see GPT-4 vs GPT-3.5 Comparison.
| Specification | GPT-4o | GPT-4 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | OpenAI | OpenAI |
| Release date | May 13, 2024 | March 14, 2023 |
| Context window | 128,000 tokens | 8,192 tokens |
| Max output tokens | 16,384 tokens | 8,192 tokens |
| Knowledge cutoff | October 2023 | December 2023 |
| Input modalities | Text, image, audio | Text only (vision in separate snapshots) |
| API input price | $2.50 per 1M tokens | $30 per 1M tokens |
| API output price | $10 per 1M tokens | $60 per 1M tokens |
| Average response latency | About 320 milliseconds | About 5 seconds |
| Retired from ChatGPT app | Yes, February 13, 2026 | Yes, April 30, 2025 |
| Available via API today | Yes, current general model | Yes, until October 23, 2026 |
What Is GPT-4o?
GPT-4o is OpenAI’s “omni” model, released May 13, 2024, built as a single neural network trained end-to-end across text, vision, and audio rather than stitching separate models together. That native design lets GPT-4o listen, see, and respond inside one system instead of routing audio through a separate speech model and images through a separate vision model, the approach GPT-4 relied on inside ChatGPT. OpenAI reported GPT-4o matches GPT-4 Turbo’s text and reasoning quality while responding roughly twice as fast and scoring 88.7% on the MMLU benchmark, versus GPT-4 Turbo’s 86.5%.
Its Advanced Voice Mode processes speech directly, supporting full-duplex conversation where the model can be interrupted mid-sentence, a capability GPT-4 never had. GPT-4o briefly disappeared from ChatGPT’s model picker in August 2025 during OpenAI’s GPT-5 rollout, was restored for paid subscribers within 24 hours after user backlash, and was then permanently retired from the ChatGPT app on February 13, 2026.
What Is GPT-4?
GPT-4 is OpenAI’s fourth-generation language model, released March 14, 2023, built for deeper reasoning and higher factual accuracy than GPT-3.5 rather than for multimodal input. Its base API version runs on an 8,192-token context window, though OpenAI later shipped GPT-4 Turbo with a 128,000-token window and vision support as a separate, faster snapshot. GPT-4 is text-only at its core: within ChatGPT, it had to call separate OpenAI systems, such as DALL-E for image generation and Whisper for speech recognition, to handle non-text input. OpenAI retired GPT-4 from the ChatGPT app on April 30, 2025 in favor of GPT-4o, and — see GPT-4 vs GPT-3.5 for how it compared to its own predecessor — its remaining API access, priced at $30 per 1M input tokens and $60 per 1M output tokens, is scheduled to end on October 23, 2026.
Feature Comparison
GPT-4o and GPT-4 diverge on five core features: multimodal input, context window, speed, language handling, and coding reliability. Each affects a different class of workload, from live voice assistants to long-document review.
Multimodal and Voice Capabilities
GPT-4o accepts text, images, and audio as native input, while GPT-4 processes text only at its core, with image understanding limited to separate vision snapshots. GPT-4o’s Advanced Voice Mode supports full-duplex audio, meaning it can listen and speak simultaneously and respond to tone, pacing, and interruptions in near real time. GPT-4 has no equivalent voice capability; ChatGPT’s older voice feature transcribed speech to text with Whisper, ran it through GPT-4, then converted the reply back to speech, adding noticeable latency at every step.
Context Window and Output Length
GPT-4o’s 128,000-token context window is 15.6 times larger than GPT-4’s base 8,192-token window, and its 16,384-token maximum output doubles GPT-4’s 8,192-token limit. A larger context window lets a model track more source material in a single request, useful for tasks such as reviewing a long contract or holding an extended multi-turn conversation without losing earlier details. GPT-4 Turbo closed part of this gap with its own 128,000-token window, but the original GPT-4 model most legacy integrations still call keeps the smaller limit.
Speed and Latency
GPT-4o responds roughly 15 times faster than GPT-4, averaging around 320 milliseconds compared to GPT-4’s roughly 5-second average reply time. That speed difference comes from GPT-4o’s more efficient, natively multimodal architecture, which needs less computation per token than GPT-4’s original design. For latency-sensitive products, examples include live customer-support chat and voice assistants, GPT-4o’s response time makes real-time interaction feasible in a way GPT-4 never supported well.
Language and Tokenization
GPT-4o handles non-Western-alphabet languages, examples include Chinese, Hindi, and Korean, more efficiently than GPT-4 due to an improved tokenizer. A more efficient tokenizer breaks text for these languages into fewer tokens per word, which lowers both API cost and processing time for non-English workloads. GPT-4 uses an older tokenizer that splits these languages into more tokens for the same text, making high-volume multilingual use measurably more expensive.
Coding Ability
GPT-4o matches or slightly exceeds GPT-4 Turbo’s coding reliability across common languages such as Python, JavaScript, and SQL, while responding faster on the same task. Both models handle multi-function code generation and debugging more reliably than GPT-3.5, but GPT-4o’s speed advantage matters directly in interactive coding assistants, examples include IDE autocomplete tools and pair-programming chat, where response latency affects usability as much as raw accuracy.
Performance Comparison
GPT-4o outperforms GPT-4 on published benchmarks while responding faster, leaving GPT-4 with no clear performance advantage left in 2026. This is a departure from typical model trade-offs, where a faster, cheaper option usually sacrifices some accuracy.
Benchmark Performance
GPT-4o scores 88.7% on the MMLU general-knowledge benchmark, a 2.2-percentage-point improvement over GPT-4 Turbo’s 86.5%, while matching or exceeding original GPT-4 on reasoning and coding evaluations. OpenAI’s own testing found GPT-4o reaches GPT-4 Turbo-level performance on text and reasoning tasks while substantially improving vision and audio understanding, benchmarks original GPT-4 was never evaluated against since it lacks native audio input.
Real-World Reasoning
Independent head-to-head evaluations found GPT-4o consistently outperforming GPT-4 on writing, coding, and STEM tasks, according to comparison testing cited by outlets covering OpenAI’s April 2025 GPT-4 retirement announcement. The gap is narrow on straightforward text reasoning, where both models handle multi-step instructions competently, but widens on any task involving an image, a voice interaction, or a non-English language. For a related comparison, see AI Comparison.
Pricing
GPT-4 costs 12 times more than GPT-4o on input tokens and 6 times more on output tokens through the OpenAI API. Both models bill per token, split between input tokens (the prompt sent) and output tokens (the response generated).
| Model | Input (per 1M tokens) | Output (per 1M tokens) | Context window |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-4o | $2.50 | $10.00 | 128,000 tokens |
| GPT-4 | $30.00 | $60.00 | 8,192 tokens |
GPT-4o’s price dropped from its August 2024 launch rate as OpenAI’s pricing has shifted over time, but it has consistently stayed a fraction of GPT-4’s per-token cost since release. Neither model is billed inside a consumer ChatGPT subscription anymore, since both were removed from the app’s model picker; the rates above apply to direct API usage only. A high-volume workload, examples include chatbot support and document summarization, is rarely justified on GPT-4 today given GPT-4o’s lower cost and higher benchmark scores at the same or better speed.
Pros and Cons
GPT-4o wins on nearly every axis except institutional track record, while GPT-4 survives mainly in legacy integrations that haven’t been migrated yet.
GPT-4o Pros and Cons
7 factors define GPT-4o’s trade-off profile:
- Pro: Native text, image, and audio input in a single model.
- Pro: Roughly 15 times faster average response time than GPT-4.
- Pro: 12 times cheaper input tokens and 6 times cheaper output tokens.
- Pro: 128,000-token context window versus GPT-4’s 8,192 tokens.
- Pro: Higher MMLU benchmark score than GPT-4 Turbo.
- Con: No longer selectable inside the ChatGPT consumer app as of February 13, 2026.
- Con: Its exact successor path (GPT-5-family models) still unsettles users attached to its conversational tone.
GPT-4 Pros and Cons
6 factors define GPT-4’s trade-off profile:
- Pro: Longer production track record across enterprise integrations built since 2023.
- Pro: December 2023 knowledge cutoff, slightly newer than GPT-4o’s October 2023 cutoff.
- Con: Costs 12 times more per input token than GPT-4o.
- Con: No native image or audio input at its core.
- Con: Smaller 8,192-token context window.
- Con: Scheduled for full API shutdown on October 23, 2026.
User Reviews
Developer feedback treats GPT-4o as the clear technical upgrade, but GPT-4o’s February 2026 ChatGPT retirement triggered an unusually emotional backlash that GPT-4’s 2025 retirement never saw. On developer forums, the consistent complaint about GPT-4 was response latency and cost under sustained use, exactly the two problems GPT-4o was built to fix. GPT-4o’s removal was different: Reddit threads with hundreds of comments compared losing access to it to “losing a trusted friend,” a Change.org petition to restore it reached close to 21,000 signatures, and a #keep4o campaign spread across social media from users who described GPT-4o’s warmer, more validating conversational tone as something GPT-5-family models don’t replicate.
That reaction reflects real product attachment rather than a technical complaint, and it is worth knowing about before assuming GPT-4o’s retirement will pass as quietly as GPT-4’s did. For a related comparison, see GPT-4o vs GPT-4.1.
Use Cases
GPT-4o fits nearly every workload GPT-4 used to handle, plus multimodal and voice tasks GPT-4 was never built for. Matching the model to the task still matters even though GPT-4o wins on cost and speed.
When to Choose GPT-4o
Choose GPT-4o for:
- Any task that combines text with images or audio, examples include document scanning and voice assistants.
- Real-time or latency-sensitive applications, examples include live chat widgets and interactive coding tools.
- High-volume workloads where per-token cost affects the overall budget.
- Multilingual products serving non-Western-alphabet languages.
When to Choose GPT-4
Choose GPT-4 for:
- Legacy integrations built before GPT-4o’s release that haven’t been migrated yet.
- Systems pinned to GPT-4’s exact output behavior for regression-testing reasons.
- Short-term use before the October 23, 2026 API shutdown, with a migration already planned.
Final Recommendation
Choose GPT-4o for nearly all new work, and treat GPT-4 as a legacy option to migrate away from before its October 23, 2026 API shutdown.
Choose GPT-4o if:
– The task involves images, audio, or a non-English language alongside text.
– Response speed and per-token cost both matter to the product.
– The integration is new or already scheduled for a model upgrade.
Choose GPT-4 if:
– An existing system depends on GPT-4’s specific output behavior and hasn’t been re-tested against a newer model yet.
– The workload is temporary and already has a migration plan in place before October 2026.
Both paths point toward the same current-generation lineup: since GPT-4o itself was retired from ChatGPT in February 2026, teams standardizing on one model today should evaluate OpenAI’s GPT-5 family directly — GPT-5 vs GPT-5 Mini breaks down that current entry-tier choice.
Alternatives
GPT-5-family models, Claude, and Gemini are the main alternatives to GPT-4o and GPT-4 today. OpenAI’s GPT-5 family replaced both models inside ChatGPT and extends GPT-4o’s multimodal design with stronger reasoning. Outside OpenAI, Claude vs ChatGPT and Gemini vs ChatGPT compare the two other frontier providers most commonly evaluated alongside OpenAI’s models. For a side-by-side view across every major provider rather than just OpenAI’s own history, see our Best AI Chatbot and Best AI Models guides.
FAQ
What Is the Difference Between GPT-4 and GPT-4o?
GPT-4o adds native image and audio input, a 128,000-token context window, and roughly 15 times faster responses compared to GPT-4’s text-only, 8,192-token design. GPT-4o also costs a fraction of GPT-4’s per-token price: $2.50 versus $30 per 1M input tokens, and $10 versus $60 per 1M output tokens.
Is GPT-4o Still Available in ChatGPT?
No, GPT-4o is not available in the ChatGPT app — OpenAI retired it from the consumer product on February 13, 2026, after briefly restoring it for paid subscribers during a similar scare in August 2025. It remains accessible through the OpenAI API.
Why Did GPT-4o’s Retirement Cause So Much Backlash?
Many users had built an ongoing, personal conversational habit around GPT-4o’s warmer tone, and its removal felt like losing that relationship rather than losing a tool. Reddit threads describing the loss as “grief,” a #keep4o social media campaign, and a Change.org petition nearing 21,000 signatures followed the February 13, 2026 retirement — a far larger reaction than GPT-4’s own ChatGPT retirement drew in April 2025.
Can I Still Use GPT-4 or GPT-4o Through the API?
Yes, both remain available through the OpenAI API as of this writing, though on different timelines. GPT-4o continues as a current general-release API model with no announced shutdown date, while GPT-4 and its snapshots are scheduled for removal from the API on October 23, 2026.
How Much Faster Is GPT-4o Than GPT-4?
GPT-4o responds in about 320 milliseconds on average, compared to roughly 5 seconds for GPT-4 — close to 15 times faster. OpenAI attributes the gap to GPT-4o’s more efficient, natively multimodal architecture, which requires less computation per generated token.
What Should I Migrate to Before GPT-4 Shuts Down?
OpenAI recommends GPT-4o or a current GPT-5-family model as GPT-4’s direct replacement, since both outperform original GPT-4 on published benchmarks at a lower per-token cost. The OpenAI Models Guide breaks down which current model fits which budget and workload.
Final Verdict
GPT-4o wins on nearly every measurable dimension — speed, cost, context window, and multimodal range — while GPT-4 remains relevant only to legacy systems racing a hard October 23, 2026 API shutdown deadline. Neither model is selectable inside ChatGPT anymore, so the practical decision for new projects isn’t really GPT-4o versus GPT-4; it’s how quickly to move off both onto OpenAI’s current GPT-5-family lineup. Teams maintaining older integrations should treat this comparison as a migration checklist: confirm which model ID a system calls, weigh GPT-4o’s cost and speed advantages against any regression risk, and complete the switch before GPT-4’s API access ends.